When Coles, Woolworths and Franklins agree on something I get suspicious. As reported in the online version of FOODWEEK yesterday,
“Woolworths, Coles, and Franklins have joined the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) in a push to make nutrition labeling more transparent and meaningful for Australian consumers by adopting the Daily Intake Guide.”
The Daily Intake Guide is a set of front of packaging labels that give a percentage of daily nutrient and energy that a standard serve of that product will provide the average adults intake.

Who decides on the average serve? Is it realistic? Does anyone take any notice?
So why do they all agree? Australian Food News reported yesterday that a survey commissioned by groups including the Cancer Council and Choice in the Sydney and Newcastle areas, showed that only 64% of shoppers surveyed could recognise healthier foods using the Daily Intake Guide. The survey showed that

- Source: Choice
the “Traffic Light” labeling system was more effective with 81% of shoppers being able to identify healthier foods using these labels.
The Australian Food News article puts the AFGC’s side of the argument through its CEO Kate Carnell, who states;
“The fact that CHOICE’s survey results contradict a large portion of
the data produced by reputable international organisations leads us to
question their approach.”
Well Well, what is the story here. Lots of axes to grind, big corporates and high profile interest groups. I’m none the wiser but I am suspicious.
Any one know what is going on?
Tim
Posted under News
This post was written by Tim on October 1, 2008
Tags: afgc, cancer council, choice, choice magazine, coles, daily intake guide, food news, food week, foodweek, franklins, healthy foods, kate carnell, labeling, traffic light, woolworths